numa.toml documented odoh entries; 404 #138
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Using the current numa.toml for reference
docs - not working
Possibly incorporate some logic from here:
https://github.com/DNSCrypt/dnscrypt-resolvers/blob/master/v3/odoh-relays.md
https://github.com/DNSCrypt/dnscrypt-resolvers/blob/master/v3/odoh-servers.md
working.. different relay (thank you Frank..)
not working of course..
Q: is it rfc technically possibly to support multiple relay servers? would think so..
(random thought)
where/what is bootstrap dns to resolve the target and relay?
I see the docs on target_ip and relay_ip which is what made me think of how the names are being resolved?
Thank you in advance.
@bcookatpcsd thanks again man!! #139 was the problem ...
On target_ip / relay_ip: when Numa is the system resolver, resolving odoh.cloudflare-dns.com has to ask someone, and if it asks itself you get a chicken-and-egg deadlock. Numa ships a bootstrap resolver (plain UDP to 1.1.1.1 / 9.9.9.9 for numa -originated HTTPS lookups) to break that loop. target_ip / relay_ip are per-hostname overrides that also close the last privacy gap - without them the bootstrap resolver learns which ODoH endpoint you're using in cleartext; with them, the ODoH relay/target names never leave your box
I'll add an enhancement ticket for multi-relay support