Merge commit 'd803bfe2b1fe7f5e219e50ac20d6801a0a58ac75' as 'vendor/ruvector'
This commit is contained in:
638
vendor/ruvector/crates/cognitum-gate-tilezero/benches/benchmarks.rs
vendored
Normal file
638
vendor/ruvector/crates/cognitum-gate-tilezero/benches/benchmarks.rs
vendored
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,638 @@
|
||||
//! Consolidated benchmarks for cognitum-gate-tilezero
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Target latencies:
|
||||
//! - Merge 255 reports: < 10ms
|
||||
//! - Full gate decision: p99 < 50ms
|
||||
//! - Receipt hash: < 10us
|
||||
//! - Chain verify 1000 receipts: < 100ms
|
||||
//! - Permit sign: < 5ms
|
||||
//! - Permit verify: < 1ms
|
||||
|
||||
use criterion::{black_box, criterion_group, criterion_main, BenchmarkId, Criterion, Throughput};
|
||||
use rand::Rng;
|
||||
use std::collections::HashMap;
|
||||
|
||||
use cognitum_gate_tilezero::{
|
||||
merge::{EdgeSummary, MergeStrategy, NodeSummary, ReportMerger, WorkerReport},
|
||||
ActionContext, ActionMetadata, ActionTarget, EvidenceFilter, GateDecision, GateThresholds,
|
||||
PermitState, PermitToken, ReceiptLog, ReducedGraph, ThreeFilterDecision, TileId, TileZero,
|
||||
TimestampProof, WitnessReceipt, WitnessSummary,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
// Helper Functions
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
/// Create a test permit token
|
||||
fn create_test_token(sequence: u64) -> PermitToken {
|
||||
PermitToken {
|
||||
decision: GateDecision::Permit,
|
||||
action_id: format!("action-{}", sequence),
|
||||
timestamp: 1704067200_000_000_000 + sequence * 1_000_000,
|
||||
ttl_ns: 60_000_000_000,
|
||||
witness_hash: [0u8; 32],
|
||||
sequence,
|
||||
signature: [0u8; 64],
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Create a test witness summary
|
||||
fn create_test_summary() -> WitnessSummary {
|
||||
let json = serde_json::json!({
|
||||
"structural": {
|
||||
"cut_value": 10.5,
|
||||
"partition": "stable",
|
||||
"critical_edges": 15,
|
||||
"boundary": ["edge-1", "edge-2"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"predictive": {
|
||||
"set_size": 3,
|
||||
"coverage": 0.95
|
||||
},
|
||||
"evidential": {
|
||||
"e_value": 150.0,
|
||||
"verdict": "accept"
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
serde_json::from_value(json).unwrap()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Create a test receipt
|
||||
fn create_test_receipt(sequence: u64, previous_hash: [u8; 32]) -> WitnessReceipt {
|
||||
WitnessReceipt {
|
||||
sequence,
|
||||
token: create_test_token(sequence),
|
||||
previous_hash,
|
||||
witness_summary: create_test_summary(),
|
||||
timestamp_proof: TimestampProof {
|
||||
timestamp: 1704067200_000_000_000 + sequence * 1_000_000,
|
||||
previous_receipt_hash: previous_hash,
|
||||
merkle_root: [0u8; 32],
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Create a realistic worker report
|
||||
fn create_worker_report(
|
||||
tile_id: TileId,
|
||||
epoch: u64,
|
||||
node_count: usize,
|
||||
boundary_edge_count: usize,
|
||||
) -> WorkerReport {
|
||||
let mut rng = rand::thread_rng();
|
||||
let mut report = WorkerReport::new(tile_id, epoch);
|
||||
|
||||
for i in 0..node_count {
|
||||
report.add_node(NodeSummary {
|
||||
id: format!("node-{}-{}", tile_id, i),
|
||||
weight: rng.gen_range(0.1..10.0),
|
||||
edge_count: rng.gen_range(5..50),
|
||||
coherence: rng.gen_range(0.7..1.0),
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for i in 0..boundary_edge_count {
|
||||
report.add_boundary_edge(EdgeSummary {
|
||||
source: format!("node-{}-{}", tile_id, i % node_count.max(1)),
|
||||
target: format!(
|
||||
"node-{}-{}",
|
||||
(tile_id as usize + 1) % 256,
|
||||
i % node_count.max(1)
|
||||
),
|
||||
capacity: rng.gen_range(1.0..100.0),
|
||||
is_boundary: true,
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
report.local_mincut = rng.gen_range(1.0..20.0);
|
||||
report.confidence = rng.gen_range(0.8..1.0);
|
||||
report.timestamp_ms = 1704067200_000 + tile_id as u64 * 100;
|
||||
|
||||
report
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Create all 255 tile reports
|
||||
fn create_all_tile_reports(
|
||||
epoch: u64,
|
||||
nodes_per_tile: usize,
|
||||
edges_per_tile: usize,
|
||||
) -> Vec<WorkerReport> {
|
||||
(1..=255u8)
|
||||
.map(|tile_id| create_worker_report(tile_id, epoch, nodes_per_tile, edges_per_tile))
|
||||
.collect()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Create action context for benchmarking
|
||||
fn create_action_context(id: usize) -> ActionContext {
|
||||
ActionContext {
|
||||
action_id: format!("action-{}", id),
|
||||
action_type: "config_change".to_string(),
|
||||
target: ActionTarget {
|
||||
device: Some("router-1".to_string()),
|
||||
path: Some("/config/routing/policy".to_string()),
|
||||
extra: {
|
||||
let mut m = HashMap::new();
|
||||
m.insert("priority".to_string(), serde_json::json!(100));
|
||||
m
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
context: ActionMetadata {
|
||||
agent_id: "agent-001".to_string(),
|
||||
session_id: Some("session-12345".to_string()),
|
||||
prior_actions: vec!["action-prev-1".to_string()],
|
||||
urgency: "normal".to_string(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Create realistic graph state
|
||||
fn create_realistic_graph(coherence_level: f64) -> ReducedGraph {
|
||||
let mut graph = ReducedGraph::new();
|
||||
|
||||
for tile_id in 1..=255u8 {
|
||||
let tile_coherence = (coherence_level + (tile_id as f64 * 0.001) % 0.1) as f32;
|
||||
graph.update_coherence(tile_id, tile_coherence);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
graph.set_global_cut(coherence_level * 15.0);
|
||||
graph.set_evidence(coherence_level * 150.0);
|
||||
graph.set_shift_pressure(0.1 * (1.0 - coherence_level));
|
||||
|
||||
graph
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
// 1. Merge Reports Benchmark
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
/// Benchmark merging 255 tile reports (target: < 10ms)
|
||||
fn bench_merge_reports(c: &mut Criterion) {
|
||||
let mut group = c.benchmark_group("merge_reports");
|
||||
group.throughput(Throughput::Elements(255));
|
||||
|
||||
// Test different merge strategies
|
||||
let strategies = [
|
||||
("simple_average", MergeStrategy::SimpleAverage),
|
||||
("weighted_average", MergeStrategy::WeightedAverage),
|
||||
("median", MergeStrategy::Median),
|
||||
("maximum", MergeStrategy::Maximum),
|
||||
("byzantine_ft", MergeStrategy::ByzantineFaultTolerant),
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
// Minimal reports (baseline)
|
||||
let minimal_reports = create_all_tile_reports(0, 1, 2);
|
||||
|
||||
for (name, strategy) in &strategies {
|
||||
let merger = ReportMerger::new(*strategy);
|
||||
|
||||
group.bench_with_input(
|
||||
BenchmarkId::new("255_tiles_minimal", name),
|
||||
&minimal_reports,
|
||||
|b, reports| b.iter(|| black_box(merger.merge(black_box(reports)))),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Realistic reports (10 nodes, 5 boundary edges)
|
||||
let realistic_reports = create_all_tile_reports(0, 10, 5);
|
||||
let merger = ReportMerger::new(MergeStrategy::SimpleAverage);
|
||||
|
||||
group.bench_function("255_tiles_realistic", |b| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| black_box(merger.merge(black_box(&realistic_reports))))
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Heavy reports (50 nodes, 20 edges)
|
||||
let heavy_reports = create_all_tile_reports(0, 50, 20);
|
||||
|
||||
group.bench_function("255_tiles_heavy", |b| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| black_box(merger.merge(black_box(&heavy_reports))))
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
group.finish();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
// 2. Full Gate Decision Benchmark
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
/// Benchmark full gate decision (target: p99 < 50ms)
|
||||
fn bench_decision(c: &mut Criterion) {
|
||||
let rt = tokio::runtime::Runtime::new().unwrap();
|
||||
let mut group = c.benchmark_group("gate_decision");
|
||||
group.throughput(Throughput::Elements(1));
|
||||
|
||||
// Full TileZero decision
|
||||
let thresholds = GateThresholds::default();
|
||||
let tilezero = TileZero::new(thresholds.clone());
|
||||
let ctx = create_action_context(0);
|
||||
|
||||
group.bench_function("tilezero_full_decision", |b| {
|
||||
b.to_async(&rt)
|
||||
.iter(|| async { black_box(tilezero.decide(black_box(&ctx)).await) });
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Three-filter decision only (no crypto)
|
||||
let decision = ThreeFilterDecision::new(thresholds);
|
||||
|
||||
let graph_states = [
|
||||
("high_coherence", create_realistic_graph(0.95)),
|
||||
("medium_coherence", create_realistic_graph(0.7)),
|
||||
("low_coherence", create_realistic_graph(0.3)),
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
for (name, graph) in &graph_states {
|
||||
group.bench_with_input(BenchmarkId::new("three_filter", name), graph, |b, graph| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| black_box(decision.evaluate(black_box(graph))))
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Batch decisions
|
||||
for batch_size in [10, 50] {
|
||||
let contexts: Vec<_> = (0..batch_size).map(create_action_context).collect();
|
||||
|
||||
group.bench_with_input(
|
||||
BenchmarkId::new("batch_sequential", batch_size),
|
||||
&contexts,
|
||||
|b, contexts| {
|
||||
b.to_async(&rt).iter(|| async {
|
||||
for ctx in contexts {
|
||||
black_box(tilezero.decide(ctx).await);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
group.finish();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
// 3. Receipt Hash Benchmark
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
/// Benchmark receipt hash computation (target: < 10us)
|
||||
fn bench_receipt_hash(c: &mut Criterion) {
|
||||
let mut group = c.benchmark_group("receipt_hash");
|
||||
group.throughput(Throughput::Elements(1));
|
||||
|
||||
let receipt = create_test_receipt(0, [0u8; 32]);
|
||||
|
||||
// Single hash
|
||||
group.bench_function("hash_single", |b| b.iter(|| black_box(receipt.hash())));
|
||||
|
||||
// Hash with varying boundary sizes
|
||||
for boundary_size in [0, 10, 50, 100] {
|
||||
let mut receipt = create_test_receipt(0, [0u8; 32]);
|
||||
receipt.witness_summary.structural.boundary = (0..boundary_size)
|
||||
.map(|i| format!("boundary-edge-{}", i))
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
|
||||
group.bench_with_input(
|
||||
BenchmarkId::new("boundary_size", boundary_size),
|
||||
&receipt,
|
||||
|b, receipt| b.iter(|| black_box(receipt.hash())),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Witness summary hash
|
||||
let summary = create_test_summary();
|
||||
group.bench_function("witness_summary_hash", |b| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| black_box(summary.hash()))
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
group.finish();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
// 4. Receipt Chain Verification Benchmark
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
/// Benchmark receipt chain verification (target: < 100ms for 1000 receipts)
|
||||
fn bench_receipt_chain_verify(c: &mut Criterion) {
|
||||
let mut group = c.benchmark_group("receipt_chain_verify");
|
||||
|
||||
for chain_length in [100, 500, 1000, 2000] {
|
||||
group.throughput(Throughput::Elements(chain_length as u64));
|
||||
|
||||
// Build the chain
|
||||
let mut log = ReceiptLog::new();
|
||||
for i in 0..chain_length {
|
||||
let receipt = create_test_receipt(i as u64, log.last_hash());
|
||||
log.append(receipt);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
group.bench_with_input(
|
||||
BenchmarkId::new("verify_chain", chain_length),
|
||||
&log,
|
||||
|b, log| b.iter(|| black_box(log.verify_chain_to((chain_length - 1) as u64))),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Chain building (append) benchmark
|
||||
group.bench_function("build_chain_1000", |b| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| {
|
||||
let mut log = ReceiptLog::new();
|
||||
for i in 0..1000 {
|
||||
let receipt = create_test_receipt(i, log.last_hash());
|
||||
log.append(receipt);
|
||||
}
|
||||
black_box(log)
|
||||
})
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
group.finish();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
// 5. Permit Sign Benchmark
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
/// Benchmark permit token signing (target: < 5ms)
|
||||
fn bench_permit_sign(c: &mut Criterion) {
|
||||
let mut group = c.benchmark_group("permit_sign");
|
||||
group.throughput(Throughput::Elements(1));
|
||||
|
||||
let state = PermitState::new();
|
||||
|
||||
// Single sign
|
||||
group.bench_function("sign_single", |b| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| {
|
||||
let token = create_test_token(black_box(0));
|
||||
black_box(state.sign_token(token))
|
||||
})
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Sign with varying action_id lengths
|
||||
for action_len in [10, 50, 100, 500] {
|
||||
let mut token = create_test_token(0);
|
||||
token.action_id = "x".repeat(action_len);
|
||||
|
||||
group.bench_with_input(
|
||||
BenchmarkId::new("action_len", action_len),
|
||||
&token,
|
||||
|b, token| b.iter(|| black_box(state.sign_token(token.clone()))),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Batch signing
|
||||
for batch_size in [10, 50, 100] {
|
||||
let tokens: Vec<_> = (0..batch_size)
|
||||
.map(|i| create_test_token(i as u64))
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
|
||||
group.bench_with_input(
|
||||
BenchmarkId::new("batch_sign", batch_size),
|
||||
&tokens,
|
||||
|b, tokens| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| {
|
||||
let signed: Vec<_> = tokens
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.cloned()
|
||||
.map(|t| state.sign_token(t))
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
black_box(signed)
|
||||
})
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Signable content generation
|
||||
let token = create_test_token(0);
|
||||
group.bench_function("signable_content", |b| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| black_box(token.signable_content()))
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
group.finish();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
// 6. Permit Verify Benchmark
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
/// Benchmark permit token verification (target: < 1ms)
|
||||
fn bench_permit_verify(c: &mut Criterion) {
|
||||
let mut group = c.benchmark_group("permit_verify");
|
||||
group.throughput(Throughput::Elements(1));
|
||||
|
||||
let state = PermitState::new();
|
||||
let verifier = state.verifier();
|
||||
let signed_token = state.sign_token(create_test_token(0));
|
||||
|
||||
// Single verify
|
||||
group.bench_function("verify_single", |b| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| black_box(verifier.verify(black_box(&signed_token))))
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Token encoding/decoding (often paired with verification)
|
||||
let encoded = signed_token.encode_base64();
|
||||
|
||||
group.bench_function("encode_base64", |b| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| black_box(signed_token.encode_base64()))
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
group.bench_function("decode_base64", |b| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| black_box(PermitToken::decode_base64(black_box(&encoded))))
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
group.bench_function("roundtrip_encode_decode", |b| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| {
|
||||
let encoded = signed_token.encode_base64();
|
||||
black_box(PermitToken::decode_base64(&encoded))
|
||||
})
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Batch verification
|
||||
let signed_tokens: Vec<_> = (0..100)
|
||||
.map(|i| state.sign_token(create_test_token(i)))
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
|
||||
group.bench_function("verify_batch_100", |b| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| {
|
||||
for token in &signed_tokens {
|
||||
black_box(verifier.verify(token));
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
group.finish();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
// Additional Benchmarks
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
/// Benchmark E-value computation
|
||||
fn bench_evalue_computation(c: &mut Criterion) {
|
||||
let mut group = c.benchmark_group("evalue_computation");
|
||||
group.throughput(Throughput::Elements(1));
|
||||
|
||||
// Scalar update
|
||||
for capacity in [10, 100, 1000] {
|
||||
let mut filter = EvidenceFilter::new(capacity);
|
||||
for i in 0..capacity {
|
||||
filter.update(1.0 + (i as f64 * 0.001));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
group.bench_with_input(
|
||||
BenchmarkId::new("scalar_update", capacity),
|
||||
&capacity,
|
||||
|b, _| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| {
|
||||
filter.update(black_box(1.5));
|
||||
black_box(filter.current())
|
||||
})
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// SIMD-friendly aggregation patterns
|
||||
let tile_count = 255;
|
||||
let e_values: Vec<f64> = (0..tile_count).map(|i| 1.0 + (i as f64 * 0.01)).collect();
|
||||
|
||||
group.bench_function("aggregate_255_scalar", |b| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| {
|
||||
let product: f64 = e_values.iter().product();
|
||||
black_box(product)
|
||||
})
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Chunked processing (SIMD-friendly)
|
||||
group.bench_function("aggregate_255_chunked_4", |b| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| {
|
||||
let mut accumulator = 1.0f64;
|
||||
for chunk in e_values.chunks(4) {
|
||||
let chunk_product: f64 = chunk.iter().product();
|
||||
accumulator *= chunk_product;
|
||||
}
|
||||
black_box(accumulator)
|
||||
})
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Log-sum pattern (numerically stable)
|
||||
group.bench_function("aggregate_255_log_sum", |b| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| {
|
||||
let log_sum: f64 = e_values.iter().map(|x| x.ln()).sum();
|
||||
black_box(log_sum.exp())
|
||||
})
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Parallel reduction
|
||||
group.bench_function("aggregate_255_parallel_8", |b| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| {
|
||||
let mut lanes = [1.0f64; 8];
|
||||
for (i, &val) in e_values.iter().enumerate() {
|
||||
lanes[i % 8] *= val;
|
||||
}
|
||||
let result: f64 = lanes.iter().product();
|
||||
black_box(result)
|
||||
})
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
group.finish();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Benchmark graph operations
|
||||
fn bench_graph_operations(c: &mut Criterion) {
|
||||
let mut group = c.benchmark_group("graph_operations");
|
||||
|
||||
// Coherence updates
|
||||
for tile_count in [64, 128, 255] {
|
||||
group.throughput(Throughput::Elements(tile_count as u64));
|
||||
|
||||
group.bench_with_input(
|
||||
BenchmarkId::new("coherence_updates", tile_count),
|
||||
&tile_count,
|
||||
|b, &count| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| {
|
||||
let mut graph = ReducedGraph::new();
|
||||
for tile_id in 1..=count as u8 {
|
||||
graph.update_coherence(tile_id, black_box(0.9));
|
||||
}
|
||||
black_box(graph)
|
||||
})
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Witness summary generation
|
||||
let graph = create_realistic_graph(0.9);
|
||||
group.bench_function("witness_summary_generate", |b| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| black_box(graph.witness_summary()))
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
group.finish();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Benchmark log operations
|
||||
fn bench_receipt_log_operations(c: &mut Criterion) {
|
||||
let mut group = c.benchmark_group("receipt_log_ops");
|
||||
group.throughput(Throughput::Elements(1));
|
||||
|
||||
// Append to various log sizes
|
||||
for initial_size in [10, 100, 500] {
|
||||
group.bench_with_input(
|
||||
BenchmarkId::new("append_to_n", initial_size),
|
||||
&initial_size,
|
||||
|b, &size| {
|
||||
b.iter_batched(
|
||||
|| {
|
||||
let mut log = ReceiptLog::new();
|
||||
for i in 0..size {
|
||||
let receipt = create_test_receipt(i as u64, log.last_hash());
|
||||
log.append(receipt);
|
||||
}
|
||||
log
|
||||
},
|
||||
|mut log| {
|
||||
let receipt = create_test_receipt(log.len() as u64, log.last_hash());
|
||||
log.append(receipt);
|
||||
black_box(log)
|
||||
},
|
||||
criterion::BatchSize::SmallInput,
|
||||
)
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Get receipt
|
||||
let mut log = ReceiptLog::new();
|
||||
for i in 0..100 {
|
||||
let receipt = create_test_receipt(i, log.last_hash());
|
||||
log.append(receipt);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
group.bench_function("get_receipt", |b| {
|
||||
b.iter(|| black_box(log.get(black_box(50))))
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
group.finish();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
// Criterion Groups
|
||||
// ============================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
criterion_group!(merge_benches, bench_merge_reports,);
|
||||
|
||||
criterion_group!(decision_benches, bench_decision,);
|
||||
|
||||
criterion_group!(
|
||||
crypto_benches,
|
||||
bench_receipt_hash,
|
||||
bench_receipt_chain_verify,
|
||||
bench_permit_sign,
|
||||
bench_permit_verify,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
criterion_group!(
|
||||
additional_benches,
|
||||
bench_evalue_computation,
|
||||
bench_graph_operations,
|
||||
bench_receipt_log_operations,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
criterion_main!(
|
||||
merge_benches,
|
||||
decision_benches,
|
||||
crypto_benches,
|
||||
additional_benches
|
||||
);
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user