Merge commit 'd803bfe2b1fe7f5e219e50ac20d6801a0a58ac75' as 'vendor/ruvector'
This commit is contained in:
37
vendor/ruvector/docs/adr/coherence-engine/ADR-CE-001-sheaf-laplacian-coherence.md
vendored
Normal file
37
vendor/ruvector/docs/adr/coherence-engine/ADR-CE-001-sheaf-laplacian-coherence.md
vendored
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
||||
# ADR-CE-001: Sheaf Laplacian Defines Coherence Witness
|
||||
|
||||
**Status**: Accepted
|
||||
**Date**: 2026-01-22
|
||||
**Parent**: ADR-014 Coherence Engine Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
## Context
|
||||
|
||||
Traditional AI systems use probabilistic confidence scores to gate decisions. These scores:
|
||||
- Can be confidently wrong (hallucination)
|
||||
- Don't provide structural guarantees
|
||||
- Are not provable or auditable
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
**Sheaf Laplacian defines coherence witness, not probabilistic confidence.**
|
||||
|
||||
The coherence energy E(S) = Σ w_e|r_e|² provides a mathematical measure of structural consistency where:
|
||||
- r_e = ρ_u(x_u) - ρ_v(x_v) is the edge residual
|
||||
- w_e is the edge weight
|
||||
- Zero energy means perfect global consistency
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
### Benefits
|
||||
- Mathematical proof of consistency, not statistical guess
|
||||
- Every decision has computable witness
|
||||
- Residuals pinpoint exact inconsistency locations
|
||||
|
||||
### Risks
|
||||
- Restriction map design requires domain expertise
|
||||
- Initial setup more complex than confidence thresholds
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
- Hansen & Ghrist (2019), "Toward a spectral theory of cellular sheaves"
|
||||
- ADR-014: Coherence Engine Architecture
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user