Merge commit 'd803bfe2b1fe7f5e219e50ac20d6801a0a58ac75' as 'vendor/ruvector'
This commit is contained in:
ruv
472
vendor/ruvector/docs/research/gnn-v2/24-quantum-graph-attention.md
vendored
Normal file
472
vendor/ruvector/docs/research/gnn-v2/24-quantum-graph-attention.md
vendored
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
|
||||
# Axis 4: Quantum Graph Attention
|
||||
|
||||
**Document:** 24 of 30
|
||||
**Series:** Graph Transformers: 2026-2036 and Beyond
|
||||
**Last Updated:** 2026-02-25
|
||||
**Status:** Research Prospectus
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Problem Statement
|
||||
|
||||
Quantum computing offers the prospect of exponential speedups for certain graph problems: graph isomorphism, maximum clique, graph coloring, and shortest paths all have quantum algorithms with provable advantages. The quantum axis asks: can we build graph attention mechanisms that run on quantum hardware and achieve genuine quantum advantage?
|
||||
|
||||
This is distinct from "quantum-inspired" classical algorithms (covered in Doc 09). Here we mean actual quantum circuits on actual quantum hardware.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1.1 The Quantum Advantage Landscape for Graphs
|
||||
|
||||
| Problem | Best Classical | Best Quantum | Speedup | Status (2026) |
|
||||
|---------|---------------|-------------|---------|---------------|
|
||||
| Unstructured search | O(n) | O(sqrt(n)) | Quadratic | Proven (Grover) |
|
||||
| Graph isomorphism | quasi-polynomial | O(n^{1/3}) (conj.) | Polynomial | Conjectured |
|
||||
| Max-Cut | NP-hard | QAOA approx | Unknown | Experimental |
|
||||
| Shortest path | O(n^2) | O(n^{3/2}) | Quadratic | Proven (quantum walk) |
|
||||
| PageRank | O(n * |E|) | O(sqrt(n) * polylog) | Quadratic+ | Proven |
|
||||
| Spectral gap estimation | O(n^3) | O(polylog(n)) | Exponential | Proven (QPE) |
|
||||
|
||||
### 1.2 RuVector Baseline
|
||||
|
||||
- **`ruQu`**: Surface codes, syndrome extraction, adaptive decoding, logical qubits, stabilizer circuits
|
||||
- **`ruqu-core`**: Quantum circuit primitives, gate decomposition
|
||||
- **`ruqu-algorithms`**: Quantum algorithmic building blocks
|
||||
- **`ruqu-exotic`**: Exotic quantum codes (color codes, topological codes)
|
||||
- **`ruvector-attention`**: 18+ classical attention mechanisms as starting points
|
||||
- **`ruvector-mincut-gated-transformer`**: Spectral methods that connect to quantum eigenvalue problems
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Quantum Graph Attention Mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.1 Amplitude-Encoded Graph Attention
|
||||
|
||||
**Core idea.** Encode graph features as quantum amplitudes. Attention weights computed via quantum interference.
|
||||
|
||||
**Setup:**
|
||||
- n nodes, d-dimensional features
|
||||
- Feature matrix X in R^{n x d}
|
||||
- Encode row i as quantum state: |psi_i> = sum_j X[i,j] |j> / ||X[i]||
|
||||
|
||||
**Quantum attention circuit:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|0>^{log n} ─┬─ H^{log n} ─── Query Oracle ──── QFT^{-1} ──── Measure
|
||||
│
|
||||
|0>^{log n} ─┘─ H^{log n} ─── Key Oracle ────── QFT^{-1} ──── Measure
|
||||
│
|
||||
|0>^{log d} ─┘─ H^{log d} ─── Value Oracle ──── QFT^{-1} ──── Measure
|
||||
|
||||
Where:
|
||||
Query Oracle: |i>|0> -> |i>|q_i> (prepares query vectors)
|
||||
Key Oracle: |j>|0> -> |j>|k_j> (prepares key vectors)
|
||||
Value Oracle: |j>|0> -> |j>|v_j> (prepares value vectors)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Attention computation via SWAP test:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
For nodes u, v:
|
||||
1. Prepare |q_u> and |k_v>
|
||||
2. Apply SWAP test: measures |<q_u|k_v>|^2
|
||||
3. This gives attention weight alpha_{uv} = |<q_u|k_v>|^2
|
||||
|
||||
For all pairs simultaneously:
|
||||
1. Prepare superposition: sum_{u,v} |u>|v>|q_u>|k_v>
|
||||
2. Apply controlled-SWAP across query/key registers
|
||||
3. Measure ancilla to get attention distribution
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Complexity:**
|
||||
- State preparation: O(n * d) classical, or O(polylog(n*d)) with QRAM
|
||||
- SWAP test: O(1) per pair, but requires O(sqrt(n)) repetitions for precision
|
||||
- Total without QRAM: O(n * sqrt(n) * d) -- quadratic speedup over O(n^2 * d) classical
|
||||
- Total with QRAM: O(sqrt(n) * polylog(n*d)) -- near-quadratic speedup
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.2 Quantum Walk Attention
|
||||
|
||||
**Core idea.** Replace random walk message passing (standard in GNNs) with quantum walks. Quantum walks explore graphs quadratically faster than classical random walks.
|
||||
|
||||
**Continuous-time quantum walk (CTQW):**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
State evolution: |psi(t)> = exp(-i * A * t) |psi(0)>
|
||||
|
||||
where A is the graph adjacency matrix (or Laplacian).
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Quantum walk attention weights:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
alpha_{uv}(t) = |<v| exp(-i * A * t) |u>|^2
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This is the probability of the quantum walker starting at u being found at v after time t.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key properties of quantum walk attention:**
|
||||
1. **Quadratic speedup in hitting time**: quantum walker reaches target nodes sqrt faster
|
||||
2. **Interference effects**: quantum walker can take "all paths simultaneously"
|
||||
3. **No locality bias**: quantum walk can reach distant nodes in O(sqrt(diameter)) steps
|
||||
4. **Ballistic transport**: quantum walks on regular graphs spread as t (not sqrt(t) as classical)
|
||||
|
||||
**Quantum walk graph transformer layer:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Input: Graph G = (V, E), features X
|
||||
Output: Attention-weighted features Z
|
||||
|
||||
1. Prepare initial state: |psi_u> = |u> tensor |x_u>
|
||||
2. Evolve under quantum walk: |psi_u(t)> = exp(-i * H * t) |psi_u>
|
||||
where H = A tensor I + I tensor H_feature (graph + feature Hamiltonian)
|
||||
3. Measure in computational basis:
|
||||
alpha_{uv} = |<v|psi_u(t)>|^2
|
||||
4. Aggregate: z_u = sum_v alpha_{uv} * x_v
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.3 Variational Quantum Graph Transformer (VQGT)
|
||||
|
||||
**Core idea.** Use a parameterized quantum circuit (PQC) as a trainable graph transformer layer. The circuit structure reflects the graph structure.
|
||||
|
||||
**Circuit design:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Layer l of VQGT:
|
||||
|
||||
For each node v:
|
||||
R_y(theta_v^l) on qubit v // Single-qubit rotation (node feature)
|
||||
|
||||
For each edge (u,v) in E:
|
||||
CNOT(u, v) // Entangling gate (graph structure)
|
||||
R_z(phi_{uv}^l) on qubit v // Edge-conditioned rotation
|
||||
CNOT(u, v) // Unentangle
|
||||
|
||||
// This creates a parameterized unitary U(theta, phi) that:
|
||||
// 1. Respects graph structure (entanglement only along edges)
|
||||
// 2. Has learnable parameters (theta, phi)
|
||||
// 3. Computes graph attention implicitly via quantum interference
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Training:**
|
||||
- Forward: Run circuit, measure output qubits
|
||||
- Loss: Compare measurement statistics to target
|
||||
- Backward: Parameter shift rule for gradients:
|
||||
```
|
||||
dL/d(theta_k) = (L(theta_k + pi/2) - L(theta_k - pi/2)) / 2
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Complexity:**
|
||||
- Circuit depth: O(L * |E|) -- linear in edges per layer
|
||||
- Measurement: O(shots) for statistical estimation
|
||||
- Training: O(|params| * shots) per gradient step
|
||||
- Total: O(L * |E| * shots * epochs)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Topological Quantum Error Correction for Graph Transformers
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.1 Why QEC Matters for Graph Attention
|
||||
|
||||
Quantum graph attention circuits are sensitive to noise. A single bit-flip error can completely corrupt attention weights. For practical quantum graph transformers, we need quantum error correction.
|
||||
|
||||
**The connection to `ruQu`:** RuVector's quantum error correction crate already implements surface codes, which are the leading candidates for fault-tolerant quantum computing. The key insight is that surface codes are themselves defined on graphs -- they are graph codes. We can use the same graph structure for both the data and the error correction.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.2 Graph-Structured Quantum Codes
|
||||
|
||||
**Idea.** Use the input graph's structure to define the quantum error correcting code. Each node is a logical qubit. The graph's edges define stabilizer operators.
|
||||
|
||||
**Construction:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Given graph G = (V, E):
|
||||
|
||||
1. Assign one physical qubit to each node and each edge:
|
||||
- Node qubits: |n_v> for v in V
|
||||
- Edge qubits: |e_{uv}> for (u,v) in E
|
||||
|
||||
2. Define stabilizers from graph structure:
|
||||
- Vertex stabilizer: X_v = Product of Z operators on edges incident to v
|
||||
- Face stabilizer: Z_f = Product of X operators on edges around face f
|
||||
|
||||
3. Logical qubits encoded in code space:
|
||||
- Number of logical qubits: k = |V| - |E| + |F| (Euler characteristic)
|
||||
- Code distance: d = min cycle length in G
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Connection to attention:** The syndrome of errors (detected by stabilizer measurements) can be used as an attention signal -- nodes near errors get extra attention for error correction.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.3 Fault-Tolerant Quantum Graph Attention
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Protocol:
|
||||
|
||||
1. ENCODE: Encode graph features into logical qubits using graph code
|
||||
|psi_logical> = Encode(X, G)
|
||||
|
||||
2. COMPUTE: Apply quantum attention circuit on logical qubits
|
||||
- Use transversal gates where possible (automatically fault-tolerant)
|
||||
- Use magic state distillation for non-Clifford gates
|
||||
|
||||
3. DETECT: Measure syndromes periodically
|
||||
syndrome = MeasureStabilizers(|psi>)
|
||||
|
||||
4. CORRECT: Decode syndrome and apply corrections
|
||||
correction = Decode(syndrome) // Uses ruQu's adaptive decoder
|
||||
|psi_corrected> = ApplyCorrection(|psi>, correction)
|
||||
|
||||
5. MEASURE: Extract attention weights from corrected state
|
||||
alpha = Measure(|psi_corrected>)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**RuVector integration:**
|
||||
|
||||
```rust
|
||||
/// Fault-tolerant quantum graph attention
|
||||
pub trait FaultTolerantQuantumAttention {
|
||||
type Code: QuantumCode;
|
||||
type Decoder: SyndromeDecoder;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Encode graph features into quantum error correcting code
|
||||
fn encode(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
graph: &PropertyGraph,
|
||||
features: &Tensor,
|
||||
) -> Result<LogicalState, QECError>;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Apply attention circuit on encoded state
|
||||
fn apply_attention(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
state: &mut LogicalState,
|
||||
params: &AttentionParams,
|
||||
) -> Result<(), QECError>;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Syndrome extraction and error correction
|
||||
fn error_correct(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
state: &mut LogicalState,
|
||||
decoder: &Self::Decoder,
|
||||
) -> Result<CorrectionReport, QECError>;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Measure attention weights from corrected state
|
||||
fn measure_attention(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
state: &LogicalState,
|
||||
shots: usize,
|
||||
) -> Result<AttentionMatrix, QECError>;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Integration with ruQu crate
|
||||
pub struct RuQuGraphAttention {
|
||||
/// Surface code from ruQu
|
||||
code: SurfaceCode,
|
||||
/// Adaptive decoder from ruQu
|
||||
decoder: AdaptiveDecoder,
|
||||
/// Circuit compiler
|
||||
compiler: GraphCircuitCompiler,
|
||||
/// Noise model
|
||||
noise: NoiseModel,
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Quantum Advantage Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.1 Where Quantum Wins
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem 1: Global attention on large graphs.**
|
||||
- Classical: O(n^2) for full attention
|
||||
- Quantum: O(n * sqrt(n)) via Grover-accelerated attention search
|
||||
- Speedup: Quadratic
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem 2: Spectral attention (eigenvalue-based).**
|
||||
- Classical: O(n^3) for full eigendecomposition
|
||||
- Quantum: O(polylog(n)) for quantum phase estimation of graph Laplacian eigenvalues
|
||||
- Speedup: Exponential (but requires QRAM)
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem 3: Graph isomorphism testing in attention.**
|
||||
- Classical: quasi-polynomial
|
||||
- Quantum: polynomial (conjectured, related to hidden subgroup problem)
|
||||
- Speedup: Super-polynomial (conjectured)
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem 4: Subgraph pattern matching for attention routing.**
|
||||
- Classical: O(n^k) for k-node pattern
|
||||
- Quantum: O(n^{k/2}) via quantum walk search
|
||||
- Speedup: Quadratic in pattern size
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.2 Where Quantum Loses
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem A: Sparse graph attention.**
|
||||
- Classical: O(n * k) for k-sparse attention
|
||||
- Quantum: O(n * sqrt(k)) -- marginal gain when k is small
|
||||
- Verdict: Not worth quantum overhead for k < 100
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem B: Local neighborhood attention.**
|
||||
- Classical: O(n * avg_degree) -- already efficient
|
||||
- Quantum: No advantage for local operations
|
||||
- Verdict: Quantum advantage requires global or long-range attention
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem C: Training (gradient computation).**
|
||||
- Classical: O(params * n * d) per step
|
||||
- Quantum: O(params * shots * n) -- shots add constant overhead
|
||||
- Verdict: Quantum gradient estimation may be slower than classical for moderate model sizes
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.3 The QRAM Question
|
||||
|
||||
Many quantum speedups for graph attention require QRAM (Quantum Random Access Memory) -- the ability to load classical data into quantum superposition in polylog(n) time.
|
||||
|
||||
**Status of QRAM (2026):**
|
||||
- Theoretical proposals exist (bucket brigade, hybrid approaches)
|
||||
- No large-scale physical QRAM has been built
|
||||
- Active research area with conflicting feasibility assessments
|
||||
|
||||
**If QRAM is available:** Exponential speedups for spectral graph attention, PageRank attention, and other global operations.
|
||||
|
||||
**If QRAM is not available:** Speedups limited to quadratic (Grover-type). Still significant for n > 10^6.
|
||||
|
||||
**RuVector strategy:** Design algorithms that degrade gracefully with QRAM availability. Use classical preprocessing to reduce the quantum circuit depth where possible.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Quantum Walk Graph Transformers
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.1 Discrete-Time Quantum Walk (DTQW)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
State: |psi> = sum_{v, c} a_{v,c} |v, c>
|
||||
|
||||
where v is position (graph node) and c is coin state (internal degree of freedom)
|
||||
|
||||
Update rule:
|
||||
1. COIN: Apply coin operator C to internal state
|
||||
|v, c> -> |v, C * c>
|
||||
|
||||
2. SHIFT: Move to neighbor based on coin state
|
||||
|v, c> -> |neighbor(v, c), c>
|
||||
|
||||
One step: S * (I tensor C) * |psi>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**DTQW attention:** After t steps, the probability distribution P(v, t) = sum_c |<v,c|psi(t)>|^2 defines attention weights. Unlike classical random walks that converge to the stationary distribution, quantum walks exhibit rich interference patterns that capture graph structure.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.2 Quantum Walk Attention Properties
|
||||
|
||||
**Theorem.** For a graph G with spectral gap Delta, the quantum walk mixes in time O(1/Delta), compared to O(1/Delta^2) for classical random walks.
|
||||
|
||||
**Corollary.** On expander graphs (large spectral gap), quantum walk attention requires O(1) steps. On poorly-connected graphs, the advantage is quadratic.
|
||||
|
||||
**Theorem.** Quantum walk attention can distinguish non-isomorphic regular graphs that 1-WL (Weisfeiler-Leman) graph isomorphism test cannot.
|
||||
|
||||
**Implication:** Quantum walk attention is strictly more expressive than message-passing GNNs for graph-level tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.3 Multi-Scale Quantum Walk Attention
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Short-range attention: t = 1 (single quantum walk step)
|
||||
- Captures local neighborhood structure
|
||||
- Similar to 1-hop message passing
|
||||
|
||||
Medium-range attention: t = O(log n) steps
|
||||
- Captures community structure
|
||||
- Quantum interference reveals clusters
|
||||
|
||||
Long-range attention: t = O(sqrt(n)) steps
|
||||
- Captures global graph properties
|
||||
- Quantum speedup over classical long-range attention
|
||||
|
||||
Multi-scale combination:
|
||||
alpha_{uv}^{multi} = sum_t w_t * |<v|U^t|u>|^2
|
||||
where w_t are learned scale weights
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Projections
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.1 By 2030
|
||||
|
||||
**Likely:**
|
||||
- Quantum graph attention demonstrated on 50-100 qubit systems
|
||||
- Variational quantum graph transformers for molecular property prediction
|
||||
- Hybrid classical-quantum pipelines where quantum handles global attention
|
||||
- `ruQu` extended with graph-structured quantum codes
|
||||
|
||||
**Possible:**
|
||||
- Quantum walk attention showing measurable advantage over classical on specific tasks
|
||||
- Fault-tolerant quantum graph attention on error-corrected logical qubits (small scale)
|
||||
- Quantum graph attention as a cloud API (quantum computing as a service)
|
||||
|
||||
**Speculative:**
|
||||
- QRAM-enabled exponential speedups for graph spectral attention
|
||||
- Quantum advantage for training graph transformers (not just inference)
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.2 By 2033
|
||||
|
||||
**Likely:**
|
||||
- 1000+ logical qubit systems capable of meaningful quantum graph attention
|
||||
- Standard quantum graph transformer implementations in quantum ML frameworks
|
||||
- Fault-tolerant quantum attention circuits compiled from high-level descriptions
|
||||
|
||||
**Possible:**
|
||||
- Quantum advantage for graph problems of practical size (10^4+ nodes)
|
||||
- Topological quantum codes custom-designed for graph transformer error correction
|
||||
- Quantum graph transformers discovering new molecular structures
|
||||
|
||||
**Speculative:**
|
||||
- Quantum graph attention running on room-temperature quantum hardware
|
||||
- Quantum supremacy for graph attention (provably better than any classical approach)
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.3 By 2036+
|
||||
|
||||
**Possible:**
|
||||
- Production quantum graph transformers for drug discovery, materials science
|
||||
- Quantum graph attention on million-qubit machines
|
||||
- Hybrid quantum-neuromorphic graph transformers
|
||||
|
||||
**Speculative:**
|
||||
- Fault-tolerant quantum graph attention with arbitrary circuit depth
|
||||
- Quantum graph transformers simulating quantum systems (quantum simulation of quantum attention)
|
||||
- Quantum consciousness in graph transformers (quantum effects in artificial cognition)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. RuVector Implementation Roadmap
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Quantum Circuits for Graph Attention (2026-2027)
|
||||
- Extend `ruQu` with graph-structured quantum circuits
|
||||
- Implement SWAP-test attention protocol
|
||||
- Add variational quantum graph transformer circuits
|
||||
- Simulation backend (classical simulation of quantum attention for testing)
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Quantum Walk Integration (2027-2028)
|
||||
- Implement continuous-time and discrete-time quantum walk attention
|
||||
- Multi-scale quantum walk attention layer
|
||||
- Integration with `ruvector-attention` trait system
|
||||
- Benchmark against classical attention on standard graph benchmarks
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Fault-Tolerant Graph Attention (2028-2030)
|
||||
- Graph-structured quantum error correcting codes using `ruQu` surface codes
|
||||
- Fault-tolerant quantum attention compilation pipeline
|
||||
- Cloud deployment targeting IBM Quantum / Google Quantum AI backends
|
||||
- Hardware-aware circuit optimization
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Quantum Advantage (2030-2033)
|
||||
- Target practical quantum advantage on specific graph problems
|
||||
- Custom quantum codes for graph transformer error patterns
|
||||
- Quantum-classical hybrid optimization loops
|
||||
- Integration with formal verification (`ruvector-verified` + quantum proofs)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
1. Verdon et al., "Quantum Graph Neural Networks," 2019
|
||||
2. Dernbach et al., "Quantum Walk Neural Networks with Feature Dependent Coins," Applied Network Science 2019
|
||||
3. Zheng et al., "Quantum Computing Enhanced GNN," 2023
|
||||
4. Childs et al., "Universal Computation by Quantum Walk," PRL 2009
|
||||
5. Farhi & Gutmann, "Quantum computation and decision trees," PRA 1998
|
||||
6. Gottesman, "Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction," Caltech PhD thesis 1997
|
||||
7. RuVector `ruQu` documentation (internal)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**End of Document 24**
|
||||
|
||||
**Next:** [Doc 25 - Self-Organizing Morphogenetic Networks](25-self-organizing-morphogenetic-nets.md)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user