git-subtree-dir: vendor/ruvector git-subtree-split: b64c21726f2bb37286d9ee36a7869fef60cc6900
47 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
47 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
# ADR-CE-013: Not Prediction
|
|
|
|
**Status**: Accepted
|
|
**Date**: 2026-01-22
|
|
**Parent**: ADR-014 Coherence Engine Architecture
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Most AI systems try to predict what will happen. This is fundamentally limited:
|
|
- Future is uncertain
|
|
- Predictions can be confidently wrong
|
|
- No structural guarantees
|
|
|
|
## Decision
|
|
|
|
**Not prediction - system shows safe/unsafe action, not what will happen.**
|
|
|
|
The coherence engine answers a different question:
|
|
|
|
| Prediction Systems | Coherence Systems |
|
|
|--------------------|-------------------|
|
|
| "What will happen?" | "Does the world still fit together?" |
|
|
| Probabilistic confidence | Mathematical consistency |
|
|
| Can be confidently wrong | Knows when it doesn't know |
|
|
| Trust the model | Trust the math |
|
|
|
|
The coherence field shows:
|
|
- Where action is safe (low energy)
|
|
- Where action must stop (high energy)
|
|
|
|
It does NOT predict outcomes.
|
|
|
|
## Consequences
|
|
|
|
### Benefits
|
|
- Honest uncertainty: "I don't know" is a valid answer
|
|
- No false confidence in predictions
|
|
- Structural guarantees, not statistical ones
|
|
|
|
### Risks
|
|
- Users may expect predictions
|
|
- Requires education on coherence vs. confidence
|
|
|
|
## References
|
|
|
|
- ADR-014: Coherence Engine Architecture, "The Coherence Vision"
|