git-subtree-dir: vendor/ruvector git-subtree-split: b64c21726f2bb37286d9ee36a7869fef60cc6900
208 lines
7.9 KiB
Markdown
208 lines
7.9 KiB
Markdown
# EXO-AI 2025: Exocortex Substrate Architecture Specification
|
|
|
|
## SPARC Phase 1: Specification
|
|
|
|
### Vision Statement
|
|
|
|
This specification documents a research-oriented experimental platform for exploring the technological horizons of cognitive substrates (2035-2060), implemented as a modular SDK consuming the ruvector ecosystem. The platform serves as a laboratory for investigating:
|
|
|
|
1. **Compute-Memory Unification**: Breaking the von Neumann bottleneck
|
|
2. **Learned Manifold Storage**: Continuous neural representations replacing discrete indices
|
|
3. **Hypergraph Topologies**: Higher-order relational reasoning substrates
|
|
4. **Temporal Consciousness**: Causal memory architectures with predictive retrieval
|
|
5. **Federated Intelligence**: Distributed cognitive meshes with cryptographic sovereignty
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 1. Problem Domain Analysis
|
|
|
|
### 1.1 The Von Neumann Bottleneck
|
|
|
|
Current vector databases suffer from fundamental architectural limitations:
|
|
|
|
| Limitation | Current Impact | 2035+ Resolution |
|
|
|------------|----------------|------------------|
|
|
| Memory-Compute Separation | ~1000x energy overhead for data movement | Processing-in-Memory (PIM) |
|
|
| Discrete Storage | Fixed indices require explicit CRUD operations | Learned manifolds with continuous deformation |
|
|
| Flat Vector Spaces | Insufficient for complex relational reasoning | Hypergraph substrates with topological queries |
|
|
| Stateless Retrieval | No temporal/causal context | Temporal knowledge graphs with predictive retrieval |
|
|
|
|
### 1.2 Target Characteristics by Era
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
2025-2035: Transition Era
|
|
├── PIM prototypes reach production
|
|
├── Neuromorphic chips with native similarity ops
|
|
├── Hybrid digital-analog compute
|
|
└── Energy: ~100x reduction from current GPU inference
|
|
|
|
2035-2045: Cognitive Topology Era
|
|
├── Hypergraph substrates dominate
|
|
├── Sheaf-theoretic consistency
|
|
├── Temporal memory crystallization
|
|
├── Agent-substrate symbiosis begins
|
|
|
|
2045-2060: Post-Symbolic Integration
|
|
├── Universal latent spaces (all modalities)
|
|
├── Substrate metabolism (autonomous optimization)
|
|
├── Federated consciousness meshes
|
|
└── Approaching thermodynamic limits
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 2. Functional Requirements
|
|
|
|
### 2.1 Core Substrate Capabilities
|
|
|
|
#### FR-001: Learned Manifold Engine
|
|
- **Description**: Replace explicit vector indices with implicit neural representations
|
|
- **Rationale**: Eliminate discrete operations (insert/update/delete) in favor of continuous manifold deformation
|
|
- **Acceptance Criteria**:
|
|
- Query execution via gradient descent on learned topology
|
|
- Storage as model parameters, not data records
|
|
- Support for Tensor Train decomposition (100x compression target)
|
|
|
|
#### FR-002: Hypergraph Reasoning Substrate
|
|
- **Description**: Native hyperedge operations for higher-order relational reasoning
|
|
- **Rationale**: Flat vector spaces insufficient for complex multi-entity relationships
|
|
- **Acceptance Criteria**:
|
|
- Hyperedge creation spanning arbitrary entity sets
|
|
- Topological queries (persistent homology primitives)
|
|
- Sheaf-theoretic consistency across distributed manifolds
|
|
|
|
#### FR-003: Temporal Memory Architecture
|
|
- **Description**: Memory with causal structure, not just similarity
|
|
- **Rationale**: Agents need temporal context for predictive retrieval
|
|
- **Acceptance Criteria**:
|
|
- Causal cone indexing (retrieval respects light-cone constraints)
|
|
- Pre-causal computation hints (future context shapes past interpretation)
|
|
- Memory consolidation patterns (short-term volatility, long-term crystallization)
|
|
|
|
#### FR-004: Federated Cognitive Mesh
|
|
- **Description**: Distributed substrate with cryptographic sovereignty boundaries
|
|
- **Rationale**: Planetary-scale intelligence requires federated architecture
|
|
- **Acceptance Criteria**:
|
|
- Quantum-resistant channels between nodes
|
|
- Onion-routed queries for intent privacy
|
|
- Byzantine fault tolerance across trust boundaries
|
|
- CRDT-based eventual consistency
|
|
|
|
### 2.2 Hardware Abstraction Targets
|
|
|
|
#### FR-005: Processing-in-Memory Interface
|
|
- **Description**: Abstract interface for PIM/near-memory computing
|
|
- **Rationale**: Future hardware will execute vector ops where data resides
|
|
- **Acceptance Criteria**:
|
|
- Trait-based backend abstraction
|
|
- Simulation mode for development
|
|
- Hardware profiling hooks
|
|
|
|
#### FR-006: Neuromorphic Backend Support
|
|
- **Description**: Interface for spiking neural network accelerators
|
|
- **Rationale**: SNNs offer 1000x energy reduction potential
|
|
- **Acceptance Criteria**:
|
|
- Spike encoding/decoding for vector representations
|
|
- Event-driven retrieval patterns
|
|
- Integration with neuromorphic simulators
|
|
|
|
#### FR-007: Photonic Compute Path
|
|
- **Description**: Optical neural network acceleration path
|
|
- **Rationale**: Sub-nanosecond latency, extreme parallelism
|
|
- **Acceptance Criteria**:
|
|
- Matrix-vector multiply abstraction for optical accelerators
|
|
- Hybrid digital-photonic dataflow
|
|
- Error correction for analog precision
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 3. Non-Functional Requirements
|
|
|
|
### 3.1 Performance Targets
|
|
|
|
| Metric | 2025 Baseline | 2035 Target | 2045 Target |
|
|
|--------|---------------|-------------|-------------|
|
|
| Query Latency | 1-10ms | 1-100μs | 1-100ns |
|
|
| Energy per Query | ~1mJ | ~1μJ | ~1nJ |
|
|
| Scale (vectors) | 10^9 | 10^12 | 10^15 |
|
|
| Compression Ratio | 3-7x | 100x | 1000x (learned) |
|
|
|
|
### 3.2 Architectural Constraints
|
|
|
|
- **NFR-001**: Must consume ruvector crates as SDK (no modifications)
|
|
- **NFR-002**: WASM-compatible core for browser/edge deployment
|
|
- **NFR-003**: NAPI-RS bindings for Node.js integration
|
|
- **NFR-004**: Zero-copy operations where hardware permits
|
|
- **NFR-005**: Graceful degradation to classical compute
|
|
|
|
### 3.3 Security Requirements
|
|
|
|
- **NFR-006**: Post-quantum cryptography for all substrate communication
|
|
- **NFR-007**: Homomorphic encryption research path for private inference
|
|
- **NFR-008**: Differential privacy for federated learning components
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 4. Use Case Scenarios
|
|
|
|
### UC-001: Cognitive Memory Consolidation
|
|
```
|
|
Actor: AI Agent
|
|
Precondition: Agent has accumulated working memory during session
|
|
Flow:
|
|
1. Agent triggers consolidation
|
|
2. Substrate identifies salient patterns
|
|
3. Learned manifold deforms to incorporate new memories
|
|
4. Low-salience information decays (strategic forgetting)
|
|
5. Agent can retrieve via meaning, not explicit keys
|
|
Postcondition: Long-term memory updated, working memory cleared
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### UC-002: Hypergraph Relational Query
|
|
```
|
|
Actor: Knowledge System
|
|
Precondition: Hypergraph substrate populated with entities/relations
|
|
Flow:
|
|
1. System issues topological query: "2-dimensional holes in concept cluster"
|
|
2. Substrate computes persistent homology
|
|
3. Returns structural memory features
|
|
4. System reasons about conceptual gaps
|
|
Postcondition: Topological insight available for reasoning
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### UC-003: Federated Cross-Agent Memory
|
|
```
|
|
Actor: Agent Swarm
|
|
Precondition: Multiple agents operating across trust boundaries
|
|
Flow:
|
|
1. Agent A stores memory shard with cryptographic tag
|
|
2. Agent B queries across federation
|
|
3. Substrate routes through onion network
|
|
4. Consensus achieved via CRDT reconciliation
|
|
5. Result returned without revealing query intent
|
|
Postcondition: Cross-agent memory access preserved privacy
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 5. Glossary
|
|
|
|
| Term | Definition |
|
|
|------|------------|
|
|
| **Cognitive Substrate** | Hardware-software system hosting distributed reasoning |
|
|
| **Learned Manifold** | Continuous neural representation replacing discrete index |
|
|
| **Hyperedge** | Relationship spanning arbitrary number of entities |
|
|
| **Persistent Homology** | Topological feature extraction across scales |
|
|
| **PIM** | Processing-in-Memory architecture |
|
|
| **Sheaf** | Category-theoretic structure for local-global consistency |
|
|
| **CRDT** | Conflict-free Replicated Data Type |
|
|
| **Φ (Phi)** | Integrated Information measure (IIT consciousness metric) |
|
|
| **Tensor Train** | Low-rank tensor decomposition format |
|
|
| **INR** | Implicit Neural Representation |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## References
|
|
|
|
See `research/PAPERS.md` for complete academic reference list.
|