git-subtree-dir: vendor/ruvector git-subtree-split: b64c21726f2bb37286d9ee36a7869fef60cc6900
241 lines
7.0 KiB
Markdown
241 lines
7.0 KiB
Markdown
# Temporal Causal Discovery in Networks
|
|
|
|
This example demonstrates **causal inference** in dynamic graph networks — discovering which events *cause* other events, not just correlate with them.
|
|
|
|
## 🎯 What This Example Does
|
|
|
|
1. **Tracks Network Events**: Records timestamped events (edge cuts, mincut changes, partitions)
|
|
2. **Discovers Causality**: Identifies patterns like "Edge cut → MinCut drop (within 100ms)"
|
|
3. **Builds Causal Graph**: Shows relationships between event types
|
|
4. **Predicts Future Events**: Uses learned patterns to forecast what happens next
|
|
5. **Analyzes Latency**: Measures delays between causes and effects
|
|
|
|
## 🧠 Core Concepts
|
|
|
|
### Correlation vs Causation
|
|
|
|
**Correlation** means two things happen together:
|
|
- Ice cream sales and drownings both increase in summer
|
|
- They're correlated but neither *causes* the other
|
|
|
|
**Causation** means one thing *makes* another happen:
|
|
- Cutting a critical edge *causes* the minimum cut to change
|
|
- Temporal ordering matters: causes precede effects
|
|
|
|
### Granger Causality
|
|
|
|
Named after economist Clive Granger (Nobel Prize 2003), this concept defines causality based on *predictive power*:
|
|
|
|
> **Event X "Granger-causes" Y if:**
|
|
> 1. X occurs before Y (temporal precedence)
|
|
> 2. Past values of X improve prediction of Y
|
|
> 3. This relationship is statistically significant
|
|
|
|
**Example in our network:**
|
|
```
|
|
EdgeCut(1,3) ──[30ms]──> MinCutChange
|
|
↓
|
|
"Cutting edge (1,3) causes mincut to drop 30ms later"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**How we detect it:**
|
|
- Track all events with precise timestamps
|
|
- For each effect, look backwards in time for potential causes
|
|
- Count how often pattern repeats
|
|
- Measure consistency of delay
|
|
- Calculate confidence score
|
|
|
|
### Temporal Window
|
|
|
|
We use a **causality window** (default: 200ms) to limit how far back we search:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
[------- 200ms window -------]
|
|
↑ ↑
|
|
Cause Effect
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
- Events within window: potential causal relationship
|
|
- Events outside window: too distant to be direct cause
|
|
- Adjustable based on your system's dynamics
|
|
|
|
## 🔍 How It Works
|
|
|
|
### 1. Event Recording
|
|
|
|
Every network operation records an event:
|
|
|
|
```rust
|
|
enum NetworkEvent {
|
|
EdgeCut(from, to, timestamp),
|
|
MinCutChange(new_value, timestamp),
|
|
PartitionChange(set_a, set_b, timestamp),
|
|
NodeIsolation(node_id, timestamp),
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 2. Causality Detection
|
|
|
|
For each event, we look backwards to find causes:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Time: T=0ms T=30ms T=60ms T=90ms
|
|
Event: EdgeCut -------> MinCut -------> Partition
|
|
(1,3) drops changes
|
|
|
|
Analysis:
|
|
- EdgeCut ──[30ms]──> MinCutChange (cause-effect found!)
|
|
- MinCutChange ──[30ms]──> PartitionChange (another pattern!)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 3. Confidence Calculation
|
|
|
|
Confidence score combines:
|
|
- **Occurrence frequency**: How often effect follows cause
|
|
- **Timing consistency**: How stable the delay is
|
|
|
|
```rust
|
|
confidence = 0.7 * (occurrences / total_effects)
|
|
+ 0.3 * (1 / timing_variance)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Higher confidence = more reliable causal relationship.
|
|
|
|
### 4. Prediction
|
|
|
|
Based on recent events, predict what happens next:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Recent events: EdgeCut(2,4)
|
|
Known pattern: EdgeCut ──[40ms]──> PartitionChange (80% confidence)
|
|
Prediction: PartitionChange expected in ~40ms
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## 📊 Output Explained
|
|
|
|
### Event Timeline
|
|
```
|
|
T+ 0ms: MinCutChange - MinCut=9.00
|
|
T+ 50ms: EdgeCut - Edge(1, 3)
|
|
T+ 80ms: MinCutChange - MinCut=7.00
|
|
```
|
|
Shows chronological event sequence with timestamps.
|
|
|
|
### Causal Graph
|
|
```
|
|
EdgeCut ──[35ms]──> MinCutChange (confidence: 85%, n=3)
|
|
└─ Delay range: 30ms - 45ms
|
|
|
|
EdgeCut ──[50ms]──> NodeIsolation (confidence: 62%, n=2)
|
|
└─ Delay range: 45ms - 55ms
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Reads as: "EdgeCut causes MinCutChange after 35ms on average, observed 3 times with 85% confidence"
|
|
|
|
### Predictions
|
|
```
|
|
1. PartitionChange in ~40ms (confidence: 75%)
|
|
2. MinCutChange in ~35ms (confidence: 68%)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Based on current events, what's likely to happen next.
|
|
|
|
## 🚀 Running the Example
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
cd /home/user/ruvector
|
|
cargo run --example mincut_causal_discovery
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Or with optimizations:
|
|
```bash
|
|
cargo run --release --example mincut_causal_discovery
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## 🎓 Practical Applications
|
|
|
|
### 1. **Network Failure Prediction**
|
|
- Learn: "When switch X fails, router Y fails within 500ms"
|
|
- Predict: Switch X just failed → proactively reroute traffic from Y
|
|
|
|
### 2. **Distributed System Debugging**
|
|
- Track: Service timeouts, database locks, cache misses
|
|
- Discover: "Cache miss → DB lock → timeout cascade"
|
|
- Fix: Optimize cache hit rate to prevent cascades
|
|
|
|
### 3. **Performance Optimization**
|
|
- Identify: Which operations cause bottlenecks?
|
|
- Example: "Large query → memory spike → GC pause → latency spike"
|
|
- Optimize: Cache large queries to break causal chain
|
|
|
|
### 4. **Anomaly Detection**
|
|
- Learn normal causal patterns
|
|
- Alert when unusual pattern appears
|
|
- Example: "MinCut changed but no edge was cut!" (security breach?)
|
|
|
|
### 5. **Capacity Planning**
|
|
- Predict: "Current load increase → server failure in 2 hours"
|
|
- Action: Scale proactively before failure
|
|
|
|
## 🔧 Customization
|
|
|
|
### Adjust Causality Window
|
|
```rust
|
|
let mut analyzer = CausalNetworkAnalyzer::new();
|
|
analyzer.causality_window = Duration::from_millis(500); // Longer window
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Change Confidence Threshold
|
|
```rust
|
|
analyzer.confidence_threshold = 0.5; // Require 50% confidence (stricter)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Track Custom Events
|
|
```rust
|
|
enum NetworkEvent {
|
|
// Add your own event types
|
|
CustomEvent(String, Instant),
|
|
// ...existing types...
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## 📚 Further Reading
|
|
|
|
1. **Granger Causality**:
|
|
- Original paper: Granger, C.W.J. (1969). "Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models"
|
|
- Applied to time series forecasting
|
|
|
|
2. **Causal Inference**:
|
|
- Pearl, J. (2009). "Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference"
|
|
- Gold standard for causal reasoning
|
|
|
|
3. **Network Dynamics**:
|
|
- Barabási, A.L. "Network Science" (free online)
|
|
- Chapter on temporal networks
|
|
|
|
4. **Practical Systems**:
|
|
- Google's "Borgmon" and causal analysis for datacenter monitoring
|
|
- Netflix's chaos engineering and failure causality
|
|
|
|
## ⚠️ Limitations
|
|
|
|
1. **Correlation ≠ Causation**: Our algorithm detects temporal correlation. True causation requires domain knowledge.
|
|
|
|
2. **Confounding Variables**: A third event C might cause both A and B, making them appear causally related.
|
|
|
|
3. **Feedback Loops**: A causes B causes A (circular). Our simple model doesn't handle these well.
|
|
|
|
4. **Statistical Significance**: Small sample sizes may show spurious patterns. Need sufficient data.
|
|
|
|
## 🎯 Key Takeaways
|
|
|
|
- ✅ **Temporal ordering** is crucial: causes precede effects
|
|
- ✅ **Consistency** matters: reliable patterns have stable delays
|
|
- ✅ **Prediction** is the test: if knowing X helps predict Y, X may cause Y
|
|
- ✅ **Context** is king: domain knowledge validates statistical findings
|
|
- ⚠️ **Correlation ≠ Causation**: always verify with experiments
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**Pro tip**: Use this with the incremental minimum cut example to track how the cut evolves over time and predict critical changes before they happen!
|